Things which are weird, #225 in a series
Dec. 8th, 2003 11:06 pmSeeing the title Battlestar Galactica in the show lineup on our Tivo.
Seeing a female Starback on said show.
Seeing an Apollo who was, amazingly enough, even whinier than the original and not nearly as cute.
Seeing Baltar getting hot Cylon nookie.
All in all, this mini-series version of Battlestar Galactica feels too Sci-Fi Channel and not enough cheesy Battlestar Galactica goodness!
Addendum, the next morning: Don't read this thread if you don't want spoilers for the new Sci-Fi Battlestar Galactica!
Seeing a female Starback on said show.
Seeing an Apollo who was, amazingly enough, even whinier than the original and not nearly as cute.
Seeing Baltar getting hot Cylon nookie.
All in all, this mini-series version of Battlestar Galactica feels too Sci-Fi Channel and not enough cheesy Battlestar Galactica goodness!
Addendum, the next morning: Don't read this thread if you don't want spoilers for the new Sci-Fi Battlestar Galactica!
Rant ahoy!
Pr3st0n: "STFU, Fangirl."
Firni: "WHY ARE THEY DRESSED LIKE MODERN-DAY EARTH? WHERE ARE THE STYLISH ALIEN OUTFITS?"
Pr3st0n: "STFU, Fangirl."
Firni: "I hate hate HATE YOU, SCI-FI CHANNEL!"
and excuse me but COLONEL TIGH IS NOT WHITE
Boomer is NOT A WHITE CHICK
Starbuck is NOT A CHICK
P.S. Glen Larson is right. They're just changing it for the sake of change, not to make it a "modern version".
Re: Rant ahoy!
Date: 2003-12-09 09:30 am (UTC)On the other hand, I then told myself, if a woman was portraying the same smarmy charm that Dirk Benedict put into Starbuck, she'd get perceived as a slut.
Also, I REALLY REALLY REALLY didn't like the telegraphing in big neon lights future boinkage between this Apollo and Starbuck. WRONG WRONG WRONGITY WRONG WRONG WRONG.
I thought Chick Boomer was Asian-looking, myself?
I waffled about the real names vs. callsigns thing. I kind of liked it but on the other hand, giving everybody first names and last names really made the culture of the Colonies start feeling too Earth-y. So did all the 'normal-looking' clothes, too. What this tells me is 'we have no wardrobe budget'! ;)
And OH THE BABYLON FIVENESS of the command crew uniforms.
Re: Rant ahoy!
Date: 2003-12-09 09:33 am (UTC)Re: Rant ahoy!
Date: 2003-12-09 09:43 am (UTC)I was less bothered by Boomer being a woman and Tigh being white than by Apollo and Starbuck just being WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG! Especially the part where future boinkage is telegraphed in huge neon lights! *BZZZT!* WRONG!
(I may be wrong about the telegraphing, but given that there were no less than three gratuitous sex scenes in Part 1, I don't THINK I am.)
I mean, Apollo was a whiny, angsty asshole a good part of the time all throughout the original series, but he did at least have some redeeming qualities! So far this new Apollo just seems to be even whinier than the original, which is rather impressive a feat.
Re: Rant ahoy!
Date: 2003-12-09 09:45 am (UTC)This Apollo: Generic. Boring. Worse than Sci-Fi's version of Muad'dib.
Re: Rant ahoy!
Date: 2003-12-09 09:50 am (UTC)This guy? Yawn. :)
Re: Rant ahoy!
Date: 2003-12-09 01:35 pm (UTC)From Murkworks MUSH, when I mentioned this thread over there:
#6: Forced proximity to Boxey and that damned robot dog would make Starbuck go on a killing rampage and drop a small tac nuke in Apollo's quarters.
Re: Rant ahoy!
Date: 2003-12-09 02:50 pm (UTC)#9: Constant taking turns as to which of them will crash-land on a previously undiscovered alien planet (where the inhabitants are all surprisingly human) this week insures neither will have handy getaway Viper for secret romantic escapades away from the Galactica.