annathepiper: (Default)
[personal profile] annathepiper

+0: Hi there [livejournal.com profile] chamois_shimi! I know you've been reading already, but welcome to the list of Folks What Have Friended Me. ^_^



+1: I have finished off The Face of a Stranger and have found it to be a diverting read. Not hit-me-over-the-head fabulous, but still fun in a subtler kind of way. There are some things about the story that kind of annoyed me; for example, as previously mentioned, I didn't like that Monk was constantly questioning himself about what kind of man he was, and in particular there is one part where he went off into several side paragraphs of such while he was supposed to be actively questioning someone about the case. That kind of took me out of the story a little.

Also, it annoyed me at first that we were introduced to Imogen and Hester and the story seemed to set it up that Imogen was going to be William's love interest. It therefore annoyed me that we got reams and reams of paragraphs about Hester and what she's been doing with her life... until I realized, 'Well, duh, Hester is actually the interesting one here.' Later parts of the story bore that out. However, the reams and reams of paragraphs about her backstory still kind of annoyed me in that 'aagh don't tell me all of this, show it to me!' way. And I kept finding myself annoyed every time the point of view shifted off of Monk--there's a big chunk from Hester's point of view, and it didn't feel like it served the purpose of the story terribly well.

And, having actually broken my arm in real life, I went 'Now wait a minute...' at the description of how Monk broke his arm in his accident, and yet, there was NO SIGN WHATSOEVER of this having impaired him during his recovery. No mention of his having difficulty dressing. No mention of his having to handle things one-handed. Not even a mention of his having to favor that arm for a little while or wear a sling. Apparently, broken arms in the Victorian era were a lot easier to recover from than broken arms NOW. ;P :) I must assume that he had a much less severe break than I did, maybe just a fracture, but it would have been nice to see at least SOME hint that the injury actually bothered him.

Now, all this said, I was actually entertained by the book. I liked that we just don't KNOW why Runcorn has it in for Monk, and I liked the heavy implication that the guy clearly knows that Monk has lost his memory. I did actually like that Hester, not Imogen, turned out to be the Interesting Sister; I was very much expecting that since Imogen was the one with whom Monk was infatuated, she was going to be the love interest. But no! And that's actually more satisfying, since we'll get to see Hester and William matching wits. So that'll be cool.

I liked that a not inconsiderable amount of his past did actually come back to Monk: his childhood, his sister, his mother. I'm very curious to know more about why this man who apparently comes from a humble background is in fact conducting himself like a gentleman, and who the still-unnamed mentor who guided him in his youth might have been. And I did like that two initially seemingly unrelated threads of the story did finally prove to be related--and I really liked the ultimate motive for the crime, which was something I didn't expect.

So yeah, I'll be buying the next one. :)



+2: The Amazon.com Recommendations engine is horribly addictive. I've spent several hours this week adding items I own to the thing just to see what it does to the list of items it recommends for me. It's been amusing watching the list change based on what I add. ;)



+3: I have lost a pound this week due to severely reducing my soda intake and drinking more water. I don't know yet if this trend will continue, but it is nevertheless very interesting to note. I've felt my appetite begin to shift a little; I've been feeling more genuinely hungry at my usual mealtimes, and food has been tasting startlingly good as well, even the granola-and-yogurt bars I've been eating for breakfast.

My sleep continues to be affected as well. I've been sleeping more heavily, and remember vividly dreaming the last couple of mornings--but even though I've been waking up right out of dreams, I haven't been quite so fried during the rest of the day as a result. I've noticed myself looking more tired, but this might be due to my system trying to readjust to altering sleep patterns. We'll see how I catch up over the weekend, when I usually have the time to get in extra sleep.



+4: [livejournal.com profile] solarbird came by to pick me up from work in the middle of the day yesterday, as she and I had to go over to Capitol Hill and sign us some Important Papers(TM) with a local attorney. I mention this mostly because it meant I had a sudden two-hour break in the middle of my workday, as we had to show up, chat with the lady, then wander off and have lunch while she drew up the papers. We went just down the street to the B&O Cafe, at which I actually remembered I've eaten before once I set foot in the place. And, to tie this in with item #3 in this entry, I had a salmon sandwich that tasted incredibly good. Yum yum yum.

Anyway, we got the papers drawn up, and that was all good, and I wound up having to stay at work a couple extra hours to make up for the time. Which I needed, as yesterday's test pass was all wonky anyway. But my beloved came and fetched me from work even after having driven around a lot all day. ^_^



-5: Courtesy of my beloved Dara, I went over to [livejournal.com profile] nihilistic_kid's journal and read this post about a company who apparently mangles old classics in the public domain by 'customizing' them with names selected by the customer. So you can go and insert yourself into Romeo and Juliet or Moby Dick or whatever.

And I just have to say how utterly appalled I am by this entire concept. How conceited and self-centered do you have to be to mangle a classic work just for the fleeting egoboo of seeing your own name inserted in place of the protagonist's? I suppose that on some level it's slightly more honest than going the Mary Sue route, but at least if you're writing Mary Sue fiction, you're exercising some glimmer of personal creativity rather than going and mangling somebody else's work. Bah.

Date: 2004-12-17 06:17 pm (UTC)
solarbird: (Default)
From: [personal profile] solarbird
Don't forget - you can't change the gender of any character, either, so NO FAG CLASSICS FOR YOU! No Linda of the Apes and her lover Jane - no Romeo and Andre'! NOT FOR YOU!

You didn't even mention that one of their suggested uses is as a company present, with the name of the CEO substituted in for the hero in an adventure novel. That's the best part.

Date: 2004-12-17 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shikyrie.livejournal.com
Don't forget - you can't change the gender of any character, either, so NO FAG CLASSICS FOR YOU! No Linda of the Apes and her lover Jane - no Romeo and Andre'! NOT FOR YOU!

Oh damn... there goes that idea down the shitter...

Date: 2004-12-18 09:25 am (UTC)
wrog: (toyz)
From: [personal profile] wrog
I'm going to guess it was more a matter of not wanting to bother with changing the pronouns rather than caving to the fundies.

You could use names like Pat and Chris, though without pronoun support, it's still gonna suck.

Date: 2004-12-18 04:39 pm (UTC)
solarbird: (Default)
From: [personal profile] solarbird
Fine, bring in reality. I'm just having fun saying NO FAG CLASSICS FOR YOU!

Date: 2004-12-17 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shikyrie.livejournal.com
+2: The Amazon.com Recommendations engine is horribly addictive. I've spent several hours this week adding items I own to the thing just to see what it does to the list of items it recommends for me. It's been amusing watching the list change based on what I add. ;)

Almost as bad as EBay... ugh... I try to stay away from all of those sites, but end up giving in at one point or another...

Date: 2004-12-17 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shikyrie.livejournal.com
I guess you have a point there... but when you don't have the money, any temptation is evil... when you see somehting you really want, like a new gaming manual or such, and don't have the money, it just blows the whole day...

Date: 2004-12-19 12:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shikyrie.livejournal.com
Very true! Though there's very little difference temptation-wise between, say, Amazon.com and a gaming store, Amazon.com takes a lot less physical effort and is therefore harder to avoid.

yup yup... I look at those and am like daaaaaaaaaaamn... i see new dragonlance books I want to read, gaming supplements, etc etc... arghhhh... ok, time to win the lotto...

Date: 2004-12-19 11:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shikyrie.livejournal.com
I've been trying to save change, etc... but being as I'm STILL the only one here that is working a steady job, every penny I save ends up getting scrounged for bread or gas or some other necessity later in the week... grr... Was going to get the Extended version of ROTK this week, and ended up having to use my paycheck to pay the Satellite bill, and paying to get Kat's phone turned back on... I'm chalking up the "she now owes me 'X' amount of money" when she gets it...

Date: 2004-12-21 06:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shikyrie.livejournal.com
well, I use the satellite tv as much as she does... but she should be able to work full-time while going to school... granted, it's tough, but I did it last year because I HAD to...

Date: 2004-12-18 05:57 pm (UTC)
solarbird: (Default)
From: [personal profile] solarbird
No mention of his having to handle things one-handed. Not even a mention of his having to favor that arm for a little while or wear a sling. Apparently, broken arms in the Victorian era were a lot easier to recover from than broken arms NOW. ;P :) I must assume that he had a much less severe break than I did, maybe just a fracture, but it would have been nice to see at least SOME hint that the injury actually bothered him.

They weren't, but if you had two servants attending on your every move, it probably would have been a bit easier to handle for you, too. ^_^

Date: 2004-12-19 11:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shikyrie.livejournal.com
But okay, yeah, he did have a landlady. ;)

Landladies do that? Man, I've really gotten all the wrong landladies.

Date: 2004-12-21 06:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shikyrie.livejournal.com
Well, this is what you get for not living in Victorian-era England and being a policeman who's lost his memory in a (still as of yet uninvestigated as of the end of Book One) accident!

Ok, who has the time machine?lets go...

Date: 2004-12-20 04:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chamois-shimi.livejournal.com
Hi! (belatedly- was gone all weekend ;) )

The antagonist's name is Runcorn, in Face of a Stranger? Aie. That would weird me out a bit- but then, names of people I've known IRL showing up that way, or vice versa, always make my brain skip a step. Like when I first saw Paul Quantrill pitch on TV... what did they say his name was?? *laugh*

Date: 2004-12-21 07:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chamois-shimi.livejournal.com
Well, knew, actually- not well, he was a professor and I was just a lowly student not even in his field, but he was a pretty darn kickass professor.

http://www.alaska.edu/opa/eInfo/index.xml?StoryID=196

Date: 2004-12-21 07:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chamois-shimi.livejournal.com
Definitely!

Have you read _The Godmother_ by Elizabeth Ann Scarborough? One of the characters is named Raydir Quantrill, which seemed like a made-up name if I'd ever heard one... until I saw Paul Quantrill pitch in a MLB game on TV. I made my SO's ears ring with the shout of WHAT did they say his name was??? I don't know why, but I just can't get over that. Quantrill!

Profile

annathepiper: (Default)
Anna the Piper

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 08:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios