annathepiper: (Default)
[personal profile] annathepiper
So if you want to type a sentence that has a clause separated off from the rest of the sentence by an em-dash or two (like this: "Blah blah blah--blah blah blah--blah blah."), what is the proper way to type this? I have discovered that this is causing some word count discrepancies since the way I was typing it before was throwing Word's word count off.

Date: 2003-11-09 10:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alinsa.livejournal.com
You should just be able to do:

word (hyphen)(hyphen) word

.. and Word will autocorrect the dual hyphens into a single emdash, as long as you have a space on both sides of it. That should, really, be all it takes... unless I'm misunderstanding the question...

Date: 2003-11-09 11:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alinsa.livejournal.com
Ah. Yes, you want an em-dash in that kind of sentence. I can't find a specific reference to whether or not there should be spaces before or after one, but most of the good examples of use I can find seem to indicate that there should not be spaces on either side of the em-dash.

Here's (http://www.alistapart.com/articles/emen/) one reference I could find after a quick search -- It's more targeted towards HTML, but also covers the general usage cases for various types of hyphens and dashes and the like, so should be helpful.

And, incidentally, the reason that 'wc' is that the wc command has a very... limited understanding of writing. That is, it considers words to be contiguous bits of text surrounded by whitespace. That's it. Since puncutaion isn't considered whitespace, word--word gets counted as one word, instead of two. And 'word -- word' would be counted as three. Go unix.


Date: 2003-11-09 03:59 pm (UTC)
wrog: (toyz)
From: [personal profile] wrog
seems to me that unless you're using em dashes really, really often --- which I imagine would make for a rather choppy writing style --- it's not going to throw the count off that much.

Date: 2003-11-09 10:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
I'd put a wordspace around both sides of the dash.

Date: 2003-11-09 11:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
Word count algorithms are so arcane and tricky that you're going to get different word counts using different tools no matter what you do. It might be a couple per cent over the course of the novel (50-100 words) Does NaNoWriMo have a standard wordcount program, or is it whatever the writer uses?

Date: 2003-11-09 11:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] holyoutlaw.livejournal.com
Ahhh -- gotcha. Okay!

Date: 2003-11-09 11:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poetry-lady.livejournal.com
Interesting that they have their own. But in a way, that is more fair in the long run, I guess. They don't have to deal with people complaining that they didn't use the same word processor and therefore got "cheated".

As for the em-dash question, here's what I know about it from my "lofty" status as a tech writer. You don't use the spaces around an actual em-dash. I don't know how word(tm) counts this--and quite frankly, it might be different between different versions of word! (Oh, and I just used an em-dash there...) I would guess NaNoWriMo's word counter takes them into account and does them correctly. If you're really unsure, you might see if you can ask someone there a question...?

I generally go by these guidelines. Use an em-dash like you would use a pair of commas, or a pair of parentheses. The use of the three depends upon the emphasis you want to give to the phrase in between. Parens are typically used when something is an aside, something that is not as important to the material at hand, but is "nice to know". Em-dashs are used when the information is parenthetical, but you want to highlight/emphasize it. Commas are used when the other two cases don't apply, and you just need the commas to give the sentence the proper pauses it would have in normal spoken conversation.

I am not sure on the formal rules, as I studied them so long ago that I can't quote. I don't have my reference books at and, they're all at work.

Date: 2003-11-09 04:55 pm (UTC)
wrog: (ring)
From: [personal profile] wrog
My theory is that the raw manuscript should be in whatever form is most convenient for you. I myself tend to favor practices that
  1. make editing easier
  2. make it easier to write scripts/macros to process the raw manuscript into whatever formats you might need.
For example, I always start each new sentence or major clause thereof on a new line. This means if I later want to rearrange sentences within paragraphs or clauses within long sentences, I'm just transposing lines (which happens to be a particularly easy operation in the editor I like to use (Emacs); YMMV). Having line-structure match up with sentence structure also has the interesting side effect of keeping me from straying too far outside the bounds of known grammar. Never mind that this is not a rule that you'll find in any style guide.

And then it's easy enough to tell Emacs or Perl to fill the paragraph and add the extra space after each sentence-ending period in order to produce the "official manuscript" format.

With respect to the various kinds of dashes, I

  • type em dashes as three hyphens (---) surrounded by spaces
  • type en dashes as two hyphens -- (no spaces)
The main point here is that this makes the different kinds of dashes visually distinct in a fixed-width font without having to use nonportable/nontypeable post-127 characters.

I'll admit that the spaces vs. no-spaces issue is a matter of visual taste; I think of em dashes as word-level elements whereas the other kinds of dashes are more intra-word. But since the style guides seem to disagree with me on this, you'll only see me doing this in raw manuscript, email, and LJ postings.

But the real point is that with em-dashes as 3-hyphens, you can now easily count up all occurrences of '---' and subtract from what wc gives you in order to get the super-accurate count of all True Words.

Date: 2003-11-10 06:13 pm (UTC)
avram: (Default)
From: [personal profile] avram
That dash-specification style is common among people who’ve used TeX, a bit of layout software that’s popular for writing computer science journals. Typing three hyphens specs an em dash in TeX, and two for an en dash.

Date: 2003-11-11 12:16 am (UTC)
wrog: (howitzer)
From: [personal profile] wrog
Guilty as charged. I'll note that I've finally broken out of the habit of typing quoted stuff ``like this''

It annoys me no end that TEX never really caught on outside of the math/cs community and that all of the folks who came along 10 years later to do their own version of desktop publishing decided to ignore it and reinvent the wheel... badly...

Date: 2003-11-09 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agrimony.livejournal.com
If you hit 50k in word's wordcount, you are pretty much guaranteed that the NaNoWriMo counter will count a higher number than that. As I recall, the counter doesn't actually tell you how many words it finds. It just verifies that you've got 50k. Anything above that is pretty much ignored.

Date: 2003-11-09 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mizkit.livejournal.com
The proper way to do it for a manuscript you're going to submit is:

"The cabby--whose name was Gary, according to the posted driver's license, and whose seventy-third birthday had been three days ago--drove like the proverbial bat out of hell, while I clung to the seat and tried not to gasp too audibly."

For NNWM, I'd say it's -- that way -- because you get more wordcount. :)

Date: 2003-11-09 01:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cafiorello.livejournal.com
I don't know about the word-count issue, but as for proper format in general: There are three things, a hyphen, an en dash, and an em dash. In Word, you can type a hyphen. You can also type two hypens together--no spaces--and autocorrect will make it an em dash. Or you can Insert Special Character and get an en dash or an em dash. To put that interjection into the sentence, you use an em dash or the double hyphens as I have done above. In case you care, en dashes are still sometimes used by pendants (like me!) in date ranges and such, but you can safely ignore them.
Cathy

Date: 2003-11-09 07:17 pm (UTC)
avram: (Default)
From: [personal profile] avram
The Official Word on whether em dashes take spaces around them is: You do whatever the style guide you’re writing for tells you to do. Or if you’re feeling lazy, you do whatever’s convenient for you and let the copy editor fix it.

If you aren’t following a style guide, you get to make up your own rules. Most style guides I’ve seen seem to say no spaces around em dash (but not all — the Associated Press house style uses spaces). Personally, I think that’s butt-ugly, so I use spaces.

Profile

annathepiper: (Default)
Anna the Piper

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 30th, 2026 06:55 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios