annathepiper: (Default)
[personal profile] annathepiper
So last night I deleted five megs of SoBig worm mail out of my spamassassin folder. This was before I went to bed around 2. I just got up to find that another five megs had rolled in while I was asleep. This, coupled with the fact that just before this damned worm hit I was having spammers forge my address on spam with increasing frequency, is starting to piss me off enough that I am about two seconds away from changing email addresses. I have had my current one for years, but this is especially unacceptable to me right now given that I can still only type decently with one hand and everything on the computer takes longer... and I am taking way too much time getting rid of the stupid spam.

My only question becomes what to change my address to.

[Poll #172054]

Date: 2003-08-24 11:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tinlail.livejournal.com
The new rule for spam proof address is mixed case, with number and non-alphanumeric charactes.

!#Joe4423@spoof.com

Date: 2003-08-24 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] janne.livejournal.com
I tend to assume that any email addy with many numbers in it is spam, myself. Looks computer-generated rather than chosen by a human, that way. Hmm....

Date: 2003-08-24 03:45 pm (UTC)
wrog: (Default)
From: [personal profile] wrog
User names are not / cannot be case sensitive; too much mail/mail-related software ignores/translates case in user names.

Nor can you use ! which refers to the UUCP network;
even if nobody uses that anymore there are still lots of old sendmail.cfs out there,

Similar story for % which was the all-purpose other-network-@ character (usually CSNET).

# is probably out, too, but I forget why

$ may be technically legal, but will confuse the shit out of any badly written rulebased rewrite thingie that uses $ for macro names (like sendmail).

In fact, pretty much any non-alphanumeric other than . or _ is suspect. And technically . isn't really part of the user name (RFC822 allows domain syntax on the user side of the @) and so may turn out to be confusing for other reasons.

Date: 2003-08-24 04:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lyricae.livejournal.com
Am I the only one who recognises this as a joke?



Date: 2003-08-26 03:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lyricae.livejournal.com
Now if only that were a marketable skill!

Profile

annathepiper: (Default)
Anna the Piper

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 30th, 2026 11:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios