To review or not to review
Jul. 29th, 2013 09:45 amFor those of you who may have missed it yesterday, it was my turn to blog on the Here Be Magic blog yesterday, so I chimed in on an interesting question that came up on the Carina authors’ loop: whether authors should review other authors’ work.
On a related note I’d like to call to your attention this post of Doranna Durgin’s, wherein she laments the most frustrating types of reviews she’s received.
Me, I’m still operating on a small enough level that I feel lucky to get ANY reviews at all, though I gotta say, I’d be right there with Doranna on being frustrated about ratings on a book that hadn’t even gotten read. I beg you, Internets: if you haven’t actually read a book yet, don’t rate or review it. It’s not fair to the author and it’s not fair to your fellow readers. And while I’m on the topic, I beg you as well to refrain from dropping poor ratings on a book for factors outside the author’s control. Like DRM or price points.
And also, I’d just like to note that A Feral Darkness does indeed remain my all time favorite Doranna Durgin book ever.
Mirrored from angelahighland.com.
Well...
Date: 2013-07-30 08:06 am (UTC)Re: Well...
Date: 2013-07-30 08:38 pm (UTC)Excellent reviews get written all the time by people who don't write books themselves. Which is one of the reasons I keep hanging out at Smart Bitches Trashy Books, for example. :) That site's entire raison d'etre is to be a review/discussion site, and while SB Sarah has become an author in her own right, she only has released non-fiction stuff about the romance genre.
On a smaller scale there are plenty of excellent indie book bloggers out there as well. But writing a coherent book review isn't the same skill as writing a coherent novel.
But that said--absolutely with you re: how a lot of good material needs all the attention it can get.