And now for your morning dose of Stupid
Mar. 16th, 2009 09:26 amApparently the Sci-Fi channel feels it needs to rebrand itself: it's going to be calling itself "Syfy" now.
I particularly like the part where they're still equating "science fiction" with "geeky loser living in his parents' basement", and how they seem to believe that girls don't like that icky "science fiction" stuff.
I'm trying to decide exactly how much this annoys me. BSG is about to end, and I haven't frankly been watching anything else the channel's been broadcasting, aside from the occasional crappy movie for a Suckoff. But this isn't because I'm not a skiffy fan. It's more because I just don't watch much TV in general these days. Nevertheless I am cranky enough to consider writing a letter to the channel. Grr.
I particularly like the part where they're still equating "science fiction" with "geeky loser living in his parents' basement", and how they seem to believe that girls don't like that icky "science fiction" stuff.
I'm trying to decide exactly how much this annoys me. BSG is about to end, and I haven't frankly been watching anything else the channel's been broadcasting, aside from the occasional crappy movie for a Suckoff. But this isn't because I'm not a skiffy fan. It's more because I just don't watch much TV in general these days. Nevertheless I am cranky enough to consider writing a letter to the channel. Grr.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 04:40 pm (UTC)Y'know, they used to show classic fantasy, SF and horror movies and TV shows, Grade A and B and occasionally C, with some strange and sometimes interesting in-house programs. There was variety, and much of interest.
For the past few years, though, I've seen very little of that. Instead they mostly show tired re-runs and their in-house Grade B and C and occasionally D movies. They seem to think, for some reason, that this is an improvement. About the only thing they show any more which I actually record for time-shifting is Ani-Monday. Even that has a nasty habit of starting a good show then switching to something else without explanation.
This new change just confirms that they don't understand their target audience. Or even what their target audience *is*.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 03:37 am (UTC)And if they're going to pull this sort of stupid renaming bullshit, I'll seriously have to reconsider whether I'm willing to give any other show they air a chance.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 05:03 pm (UTC)No, it's the fact that they cancel decent shows and replace them with "Ghost Hunters", wrestling and horrible, horrible movies.
BTW
Date: 2009-03-16 05:35 pm (UTC)And via yet another friend, some addresses for you!
http://txtriffidranch.livejournal.com/277752.html
Re: BTW
Date: 2009-03-16 06:54 pm (UTC)Re: BTW
Date: 2009-03-16 07:19 pm (UTC)Re: BTW
Date: 2009-03-17 03:40 am (UTC)And if they're going to pull this kind of bullshit with their branding, clearly they don't want me around as a target audience member anyway!
Re: BTW
Date: 2009-03-17 03:39 am (UTC)Re: BTW
Date: 2009-03-17 04:01 am (UTC)Re: BTW
Date: 2009-03-17 04:08 am (UTC)Dara just relayed off of
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 03:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 03:33 am (UTC)If they'd actually continue to show stuff that doesn't suck, they wouldn't need to pull these stupid semantic tricks. But I can't think of a single thing on the channel that I'll actually bother to watch after BSG's final episode airs next week, and this kind of semantic bullshit is unfortunately making me seriously reconsider checking out Caprica once it airs next year.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 03:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 09:45 pm (UTC)But I must admit that I gave up on BSG a while back, even, angry at the inconsistent characterization. But I've been hearing people chat about the finale... IYO, has it gotten any better?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 03:30 am (UTC)And yeah, seriously, if you're going to show that many crappy movies, the least you can do is make sure they're the ones for MST3K!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 09:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 05:00 am (UTC)Sci-FiSyFy interested in entertaining me. Which they don't want to do, because I don't exist.no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 03:53 am (UTC)I'm clearly a figment of someone's imagination. I'd say I'm a Mary Sue, even, except my eyes aren't purple!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 11:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-16 11:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-17 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-18 01:38 pm (UTC)I went without TV for almost 3 years starting from that event.
Honestly, we're on IP TV these days courtesy of AT&T. We're to the point where we're on a tech that would let us just subscribe to shows if they were delivered in that fashion to the DVR.
I'm done with subscribing to networks. I just want to subscribe to shows.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-19 02:56 am (UTC)Yes! I've been doing way more TV watching via DVDs lately than I have been when episodes actually air, and in the future I suspect I'll be way more inclined to do things like watching episodes online. I would totally groove on a "subscribe me to this TV show" model.
Especially if the traditional networks continue to demonstrate the Dumb.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 02:19 pm (UTC)On the other hand, the networks have also done very well by packaging up the shows for DVD. I've heard in many cases that they're making far more on the DVDs than they did on the original broadcast - but I have no numbers to back that up. But in that particular case, they're making the money long after the expenses.
This suggests that they need a model where they can recoup production costs up front and have a model where they plan on making more of their money out the back end. That's certainly not something that makes traditional media investors happy. They want something they can get good profits on quarter to quarter.
We can at least be happy that IP multicast has become pervasive in set top boxes. This means that we're likely one cable network away from someone deciding to go with the subscription model using delayed broadcast delivery with a DVR to catch it.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-19 08:00 pm (UTC)And I have heard speculation this will justify them keeping the SF content low and devoting more time to wrestling, Scare Tactics and reruns of Lost.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-19 08:14 pm (UTC)And indeed, the actual real SF/F content on the channel is awfully low these days. Lost is arguably an SF show in many ways, but wrestling? Not so much.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-19 08:46 pm (UTC)