This is a test!
Oct. 31st, 2008 07:36 pmI'm testing to see how well running the Semagic Livejournal client under Crossover on OS X works. Because I don't miss much about Windows, but I do miss Semagic; the available OS X LJ clients just don't compare.
Test, test, test!
Test, test, test!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 05:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 05:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 06:25 pm (UTC)Crossover lives here.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 07:11 pm (UTC)I'm running that too at the moment, although I may get to downgrade to just having that around in case I need to do actual Windows-based testing on this machine for some reason. Having Crossover seems full of promise, though. It'd be nice to be able to run things without having to launch Parallels.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 08:37 pm (UTC)But if you have a PowerPC, or if you're running Tiger or older, you could possibly still do it.
Here is the Wikipedia page about it. Note that it also says that you have to have a full install of OS 9 on the system for it to work. It apparently treats it like a VM for purposes of launching OS 9 apps.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 08:39 pm (UTC)Oh well, guess I'll use them on my old G3.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-02 03:22 am (UTC)I keep WinXP around just for the rare occasions where I must use it for something, but I keep it in Sun Virtualbox. That way I don't have to lose my linux while working in windows. Of 3.5GB of RAM on my laptop, I keep 1G aside for the windows (and boy does it crave RAM!).
I turned off all fancy screen goodies in windows, preferring to get my graphical jollies through compiz fusion on my Ubuntu. All in all it seems to run very well. And the fun part is, since the virtual guest is inside a linux host, I can nail its outside network access down tight.
BTW...you AND Dara got Crossover? I have refrained from any open expression of distaste for Windows in her presence because I know she's written technical articles for Microsoft. I had no idea she wasn't using it.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-02 03:44 am (UTC)And sure, she writes articles for Microsoft, but that's mostly because they keep giving her money. ;) Me, I do prefer that people refrain from snarking on Windows just for the sake of snark.
As for the solution you describe... well, running Windows as a VM in Parallels on my Mac is acceptable for my needs. I mostly keep it for running Money to balance my checkbook, and because I sometimes need to launch Windows browsers for testing stuff. It doesn't take over the Mac, now that I have 2G of RAM.
Really, mostly we got Crossover because they were briefly handing it out for free, so we figured what the hell. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-02 04:05 am (UTC)I haven't used Parallels, didn't realize it's a VM. I love VMs because you don't have to stop doing what you love in order to do what you must. :)
I too have deep and abiding loathing for Windows; the kind that goes deeper than mere snark. :-) When someone in my office winds up a victim of some social engineering stunt like "Windows Antivirus 2008" and winds up at the mercy of malware, they are guaranteed to get a hearty pontificatin' while I clean the crap off their machine.
Not to say that social engineering victims are limited to Windows...back in the glorious days when your internet account was a dialup *nix terminal server, many misguided people would accept IRC scripts and run them, not knowing that there were backdoors inside that could give the author access to the user's command shell....or internal triggers, so that if the a specific command was given through CTCP, it would execute a command like
'yes echo EAT SHIT | mail root'
through the user's shell. FUN TIMES!!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-02 06:29 pm (UTC)Re: the rest, heh, yeah. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-01 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-02 08:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 11:43 pm (UTC)Note that your system may not show you the contents of that directory by default. If it doesn't, it's simple enough to turn that on.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 11:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 04:34 am (UTC)You want mfc42.dll and mfc42u.dll (I had the names wrong before). Everything else I suspect is optional. :)