Book Log #102: The Mist, by Stephen King
Dec. 9th, 2007 09:54 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I was talking with
kisanthe the other day online about how she'd just finished reading It, and how I hadn't read all that much of Stephen King's work myself--just It, Cujo, and The Shining. Out of general curiosity, and since I saw the recently released edition that ties in with the movie that's come out, I decided to tackle The Mist.
It's official: this is a tight little story, and pretty creepy as well. The prose is very spare and very clean, which is exactly right for the overall atmosphere of the plot. There's just enough setup to give you an idea of the protagonist, his wife, and his son, and how they've got an ongoing conflict with a neighbor about boundary disputes between their properties. Then a savage band of storms flattens their quiet community, and in its wake comes something even stranger: a mist filled with horrific monsters. The protagonist, his son, their neighbor, and dozens of others are trapped in a supermarket. Death, doom, and destruction ensue.
What really makes this tale work for me, I think, is the ambiguity of what the characters are facing. There's speculation about what causes the mist and its monsters--but nothing is ever proven. And yeah, the comparison of the monsters against the chilling behavior of some of the survivors is effective. My only quibble is that the ending feels a little rushed and weak to me. But then, I think that's also my automatic looking for resolution in a plot kicking in there. That there isn't any resolution to speak of, in this particular instance, is all part of the point. So: four stars!
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
It's official: this is a tight little story, and pretty creepy as well. The prose is very spare and very clean, which is exactly right for the overall atmosphere of the plot. There's just enough setup to give you an idea of the protagonist, his wife, and his son, and how they've got an ongoing conflict with a neighbor about boundary disputes between their properties. Then a savage band of storms flattens their quiet community, and in its wake comes something even stranger: a mist filled with horrific monsters. The protagonist, his son, their neighbor, and dozens of others are trapped in a supermarket. Death, doom, and destruction ensue.
What really makes this tale work for me, I think, is the ambiguity of what the characters are facing. There's speculation about what causes the mist and its monsters--but nothing is ever proven. And yeah, the comparison of the monsters against the chilling behavior of some of the survivors is effective. My only quibble is that the ending feels a little rushed and weak to me. But then, I think that's also my automatic looking for resolution in a plot kicking in there. That there isn't any resolution to speak of, in this particular instance, is all part of the point. So: four stars!
no subject
Date: 2007-12-10 06:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:42 am (UTC)And agreed w/you that some of his best work is in his short stories. Strangely enough, I could wax eloquent about some.
I say "strangely enough", and feel weird whenever King comes up, because while I like more than half of what he's written--some of it I think terrific--reading a lot of his commentary in teh last few years has made me no longer a King fan. And he seems to actively dislike "The Gunslinger", to the point that I refuse to read his rewrite of it, even tho Gunslinger & Carrie are his two best novels, imo.
ita w/Anna about the mist, also, and muchest sympathy from someone who is *frequently* very klutzie, to the point my s.o. has given me a nickname based on my tendency to bump into things. (we have lots of names for each other, but I give her reason to use this one at least once a day)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:45 am (UTC)Heh, thanks! Hopefully this won't happen again any time soon. Or at least before I'm done with the zapping.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-10 06:43 am (UTC)Maybe I should start again :-)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:20 am (UTC)