![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Four books in, and I'm finally into territory I hadn't read before--though not entirely new story yet, since I'm farther ahead with the movies than I am with the books. Still, though, it was good to get the entire, full-length book version of the Goblet of Fire story. The biggest fun I had with this entire thing was the raising of the stakes with the return of Voldemort, and the expansion of what the reader gets to know about the world past what goes on at Hogwarts. The opening chapter being entirely outside Harry's point of view was a refreshing switch. Also, points to Dumbledore for finally doing a bit of badassery on camera, and showing something of why he has such a rep of being Most Awesome Wizard Around.
Favorite side details: the leprechauns at the Quidditch World Cup forming giant messages like HA HA in the air. Hagrid and Madame Maxime, whose love is apparently very, ah, large. ;) Seeing the older Weasley brothers, Bill and Charlie, on camera--and oh look, finally, somebody in this cast I might actually find kind of hot, since Bill and Charlie both sound rather cool. Hermione's little moment of glory at the Yuletide dance, which has rather more impact in the book than it does on film. And ah yes, the joy of seeng Malfoy being turned into a ferret.
('Cause I still ain't feeling the Malfoy love, or for that matter, the Snape love. Though I will grant that it's also cool to finally see some more reason why Snape is interesting. I don't find him the slightest bit swoonable, but I definitely find him interesting. Malfoy, on the other hand, remains an annoying little twatwaffle. Comparing the two, I find my desire to see some sign of Slytherin characters with actual morals increasing. It gets kind of tiresome for all the Slytherins to be twatwaffles all of the time, after all.)
Also, not to be repetitive or anything, but GAH, the ellipses! Rowling only seems to whip them out in Big Important Plot Point Moments, but this time around, it was particularly painful to read. Especially in the big Voldemort Explains His Devious Plan Chapter, where we got ellipses all over the place in his dialogue and in the narrative. For me, the ultimate effect of this was that Voldemort's dialogue read like either a) he kept wandering off his train of thought, or b) he was doing a very bad William Shatner impersonation. Neither of these possibilities added to his overall intimidation factor, I'm tellin' ya.
So, long story (and this was quite the long story) short, on the one hand I have very cool expansion of what the reader knows balanced against what should have been a way more intimidating Villain Reveal sequence than it actually was. I'm giving this installment three stars.
Favorite side details: the leprechauns at the Quidditch World Cup forming giant messages like HA HA in the air. Hagrid and Madame Maxime, whose love is apparently very, ah, large. ;) Seeing the older Weasley brothers, Bill and Charlie, on camera--and oh look, finally, somebody in this cast I might actually find kind of hot, since Bill and Charlie both sound rather cool. Hermione's little moment of glory at the Yuletide dance, which has rather more impact in the book than it does on film. And ah yes, the joy of seeng Malfoy being turned into a ferret.
('Cause I still ain't feeling the Malfoy love, or for that matter, the Snape love. Though I will grant that it's also cool to finally see some more reason why Snape is interesting. I don't find him the slightest bit swoonable, but I definitely find him interesting. Malfoy, on the other hand, remains an annoying little twatwaffle. Comparing the two, I find my desire to see some sign of Slytherin characters with actual morals increasing. It gets kind of tiresome for all the Slytherins to be twatwaffles all of the time, after all.)
Also, not to be repetitive or anything, but GAH, the ellipses! Rowling only seems to whip them out in Big Important Plot Point Moments, but this time around, it was particularly painful to read. Especially in the big Voldemort Explains His Devious Plan Chapter, where we got ellipses all over the place in his dialogue and in the narrative. For me, the ultimate effect of this was that Voldemort's dialogue read like either a) he kept wandering off his train of thought, or b) he was doing a very bad William Shatner impersonation. Neither of these possibilities added to his overall intimidation factor, I'm tellin' ya.
So, long story (and this was quite the long story) short, on the one hand I have very cool expansion of what the reader knows balanced against what should have been a way more intimidating Villain Reveal sequence than it actually was. I'm giving this installment three stars.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 06:16 am (UTC)Don't expect any royalties, however.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-03 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 02:43 pm (UTC)While I'm in the swoonable Snape camp myself, that's admittedly more based on the Alan Rickman Snape than the Rowling one :D That mans voice should be R-rated or something.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 07:09 pm (UTC)As for Mr. Rickman, I do grant you, movie!Snape is more appealing than book!Snape, in no small part because the dude does have a very delicious voice.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 07:24 pm (UTC)Draco I'd buy as swoonable if he had any sign of style or any trace of sympathetic characteristics. I mean, I get the whole Bad Boy Appeal thing. I spent a good chunk of the years of watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer, after all, ogling Spike. ;) But the thing with Spike was, he had style and humor and occasional glimmers of better character that led him on an interesting development arc later. With Draco, four books in, all I'm seeing is continued twatitude with nothing sympathetic to balance that out.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 07:41 pm (UTC)And like you, I totally don't get the Draco-love, except that for a while there a very, very different Draco in Cassandra Claire's Draco trilogy was quite popular online. I'm assuming that's where it all came from.
Agreed w/you about Slytherins not having to be evil, but as far as the ones you actually see? Okay, plenty of them aren't necessarily evil, depending on what you call evil, but there isn't a one I'd want to spend time hanging out with. A bunch of sociopaths, they strike me as.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-03 07:53 pm (UTC)And sure, the Slytherins we see in the books are a bunch of twonks. Which is my entire point. I'd like to see more Slytherins who aren't twonks. Part of me suspects that anybody who's in Slytherin and who's going to wind up halfway decent may be more likely to be a twonk in their childhood and adolescence, though; the closer to decent Slytherins may not show their true colors until they're actually grown up.
I find myself wondering, for example, whether Mad-Eye Moody might have been a Slytherin. So far I've seen no reference that says what House he might have been in as a youngster, but he certainly seems to have that idea of "willing to do whatever it takes to achieve his ends", and yet he still falls on the side of the light.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 11:31 pm (UTC)I actually liked it, well enough that I read her real book when it came out earlier this year w/a slight name respelling (Cassandra Clare). (yes, I know, ff people get irritated w/that real vs fanfic distinction, but it's one I make--apologies if me saying so bugs you tho)
That's an interesting take on mad-eye, & would be even more interesting if turned out to be true. Heh, maybe I should run the idea by one of my more hp fannish friends who might remember enough of the appropriate details to give a more educated opinion than I can.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-07 06:37 am (UTC)More HP-ness to come when I read Book 7. Which I do still intend to do. Honest!
no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-05 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-06 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-10 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-10 05:09 am (UTC)