annathepiper

kieri, I just discovered that Nightingale is indeed on Rhapsody! I've added all three of their albums to my lineup to listen to.

solcita, Gaia Consort is there, too! I've added all four albums! And

spazzkat says that GC is on iTunes as well.

And oh look! Afro Celt Sound System is there too! I've kept meaning to check them out. *adds*

Good music morning! ^_^

Current Mood: shocked

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

From:

annathepiper

And see, every single one of these issues you bring up is part why I prefer to buy physical CDs whenever possible. I've made exactly two exceptions so far in this--buying an online version of the Great Big CD because it was packaged with a DVD I already had, and I didn't want the DVD twice. And buying Russell Crowe's My Hand, My Heart because the only way I could get it was online. I'll also make exceptions in cases where a physical CD was released but isn't available anymore--there's some early Carbon Leaf I may wind up purchasing online, since I can't find those discs in local stores. (Though I may wind up buying them off Amazon first.)

I figure if I really want the music, I should buy it. This is why I thank folks who offer to burn me copies of albums I don't own yet, but decline. It's all very well and good, I think, to point out that most big record companies are screwing over their artists--and I don't dispute that. But an artist or group isn't going to get dime one if I don't actually buy the album, regardless of what form I buy it in. So if I really like it, I'll buy it.

Limiting the number of computers I play the music on doesn't bug me. I only play music on one computer in the house anyway--my own. If I want to listen to my own music from a different system on my house network, that's also blindingly easy, I just have to share out my library to make it readable on the house network, load iTunes on another system, boom, the music is there. But usually I don't bother, if nothing else because I have a collection of perfectly decent CDs that I can load into our perfectly decent entertainment system. :) And the entertainment system has way better speakers than my computer does, anyway.

Limiting the number of CD burns also doesn't bug me, and this is why--you can rip a burned CD right back onto your computer to get unprotected versions of the files, if you really feel that passionately about it. But again, so far, I haven't had to bother. Since the vast majority of my collection is on physical CD anyway, and none of the bands I like are on labels big enough and assholish to try to be messing around with copy-protected CDs (i.e., Sony), it's not really an issue for me at all.

I understand your frustration about copyright protection--though to be fair, iTunes is not the only player that uses copyright protection off its store. Media Player does it too, and I'm pretty sure Rhapsody's purchasing service will also use DRM, though I haven't used it yet so I don't know this for certain. So if you want to critique a player for these things (and again, I can understand your frustration), don't just take it out on iTunes.

Yes, the way Rhapsody works is that you lose access to the music once you stop paying, unless you actually buy your own copy of a song or an album for your permanent use. But again--doesn't bug me. Like I said, right now I get to use the service for free anyway, and since it got installed right there on my work box when it was set up for me, I figured what the hell. :)

Once this contract is up, I'll see what happens next. If I want to find another service that'll let me check out streaming music for free as a means of previewing albums, I'll think about emusic and Pandora then... but usually when I'm at home anyway, my time on my computer is devoted to my writing. So I don't need such a service very often. :) But again, thank you for recommending them and I WILL keep them in mind.

No worries about this being a hot button issue for you--I know it's a hot button for a lot of folks, actually. But you've expressed yourself well and reasonably here and I respect that, even if I don't share some of your specific opinions here. :)

From:

peregrine-ek.livejournal.com

There is no guarantee that the CD isn't copyright-protected as well. You have no doubt heard about the major embarrassment Sony suffered because of their XCP copyright protection that wrote code to the rootkit. As for computers, my work computer is not shared with my home network, and for that matter, none of my home computers are shared other than sharing the Internet connection, nor am I as technically savvy as you. I have a laptop, my tower, and my laptop at work, plus I sometimes use my husband's computer. I am almost at the limit of what Apple allows for authorized music. Umm, I don't use any of those other players. I use WinAmp and it works really well with the iPod, except for the part about not playing protected music. In earlier versions of iTunes, it was possible to strip out the DRM using JHymn. But so far, no one has cracked the code for iTunes 6 purchased music, so I follow the burn to CD and then rip to mp3 route like I did for the Afro Celts. And to me, sharing music with a friend is no different than making a cassette for them. I do admit to using a certain file sharing service to sample new music, but I am not on there often and only share my music when I am downloading stuff. So perhaps I am a lesser pirate, and certainly no real threat to the music industry. I have perhaps bought 100x more music than most people, being a former DJ, so when I see the music industry suing grandmothers and pre-pubescent kids, I get rather angry.

Anyway, if I were in your shoes, I would definitely take advantage of the music streaming too.

From:

annathepiper

Well, there's a pretty reasonable guarantee for me that the CDs I purchase won't be copy-protected--just because the vast majority of music I buy is on small labels, and/or companies who have no track record at all with doing such things. (Such as Rounder Records, Great Big Sea's label.) The vast majority of small labels won't have the finances necessary to hire people to do copy protection on the disc releases for them. It's one of the advantages, I suppose, of not being interested in the most popular styles of music or the "big artists". I kind of doubt anybody's going to bother to try to copy-protect Irish/Celtic trad. Or Newfoundland trad, for that matter. ;)

I've absolutely heard about the Sony fiasco, which is why I mentioned them in my comment above--I wasn't buying any of the artists on their label before anyway, and that disaster of theirs has assured that I won't be buying any of their discs in the future. I've been doublechecking to make sure that the artists and groups I like aren't on Sony, and so far, not a problem.

And like I said--I can understand your frustration. I'm not trying to tell you that you ought to change your mind about any of this, I'm mostly just trying to explain why this hasn't been an issue for me so far. You've done very well explaining where you're coming from, just trying to do likewise. So no worries. :)

From:

peregrine-ek.livejournal.com

It is very nice to "talk" with you, and I certainly don't expect everyone to share my views -- God forbid. And like you, most of the music I buy is independently released.

back to my webex conference.