And oh yes...
Oct. 26th, 2005 03:03 pmI have now hit the five-month mark with Luna!
I've started getting more nervous about the status of my manuscript these days, and have to keep myself from wondering things like whether it fell down behind some editor or other's desk, or whether they actually sent it back two months ago and it got misdirected, or, or, or.
I am waffling about whether to send them a nudge now or give them until the six-month mark. And whether I should send a polite little letter asking after my manuscript (with an SASP enclosed for a reply, of course), or whether I should just suck it up and call them, braced for a possible "Oh yes, THAT book, we sent it back to you three days ago, guess it just hasn't gotten back to you yet!" reply.
Agh! The suspense!
Right. There's something I'm supposed to be doing to alleviate this. It's called WORKING ON THE OTHER BOOK.
Days without a rejection letter from Luna: 5 months, 0 days
I've started getting more nervous about the status of my manuscript these days, and have to keep myself from wondering things like whether it fell down behind some editor or other's desk, or whether they actually sent it back two months ago and it got misdirected, or, or, or.
I am waffling about whether to send them a nudge now or give them until the six-month mark. And whether I should send a polite little letter asking after my manuscript (with an SASP enclosed for a reply, of course), or whether I should just suck it up and call them, braced for a possible "Oh yes, THAT book, we sent it back to you three days ago, guess it just hasn't gotten back to you yet!" reply.
Agh! The suspense!
Right. There's something I'm supposed to be doing to alleviate this. It's called WORKING ON THE OTHER BOOK.
Days without a rejection letter from Luna: 5 months, 0 days
no subject
Date: 2005-10-26 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-26 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-26 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-26 11:09 pm (UTC)I think I'll do it that way. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 12:11 am (UTC)And then there's Catie, who broke the mold for all of us. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 12:15 am (UTC)She has been telling me though that the longer it takes to get a reply, the better my chances are, indeed! Which is exactly why I'm getting twitchier now than I was earlier on!
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 12:31 am (UTC)(Agh! The suspense! Agh! I suppose I'll get more used to this as I do it more often, but for now, agh! ;) )
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 12:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 02:04 am (UTC)They're just rereading it a couple of times because they can't believe how good it is? Maybe someone's chortling with glee because you sent it to them and not another publishing house? ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 04:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 05:08 am (UTC)x 2
Bookage..
Date: 2005-10-27 02:02 pm (UTC)Re: Bookage..
Date: 2005-10-27 04:53 pm (UTC)So just based on my own experience with sending out manuscripts so far, this is kind of hopeful. However, I also know that
no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-27 07:35 pm (UTC)(Also, HAPPY BIRTHDAY, KELLI!)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-29 01:59 am (UTC)Actually, most of their time is certainly being taken up with handling their already-established authors (like oh, say,
But still, agh, the suspense! :)
no subject
Date: 2005-10-29 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-29 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-30 02:52 am (UTC)Hang in there, I have faith in you.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-20 09:08 pm (UTC)But I wanted to answer this comment anyway to let you know that I saw it, and to give you a big ol' sisterly hug and a thank you for that vote of confidence! :) I'm trying to knock off a lot of my backlogged LJ comments today, before I go diving into today's round of words for Nanowrimo.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 04:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-22 04:24 am (UTC)