Date: 2005-08-05 06:50 pm (UTC)
Well... not to put too fine a point on it, but the circumstances around that case don't give me a warm fuzzy.

Yes, it implies, in this area he might not be an ideologue.

On the other hand, the area in which he has been most consistent is supported buy this.

He was employed by a firm which took the case as part of its pro bono work. He was assigned to it. He did a solid work.

His career has been marked by a steady deference to authority. His opinions from the bench have never gone against the White House (recall though that his tenure on the bench is only the past two years, under this White House).

In short, he never saw a request for presidential power he didn't agree with.

TK
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

annathepiper: (Default)
Anna the Piper

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13 141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 07:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios